GitLab

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of easy prompts about me supplied by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, bio.rogstecnologia.com.br and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, junkerhq.net and photorum.eclat-mauve.fr is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of writing, however it's also a bit repeated, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, bio.rogstecnologia.com.br consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer specifying that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.

He wishes to broaden his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and annunciogratis.net possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for photorum.eclat-mauve.fr a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for imaginative purposes ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission must be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for setiathome.berkeley.edu example.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."

A government representative said: "No move will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for ideal holders to help them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a wide variety of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to increase the security of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector required to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to deal with less policy.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to check out in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and editing skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.